When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only accomplished In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Some pluralist systems, like Scots law in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, tend not to exactly fit into the dual common-civil regulation system classifications. These types of systems may perhaps have been heavily influenced via the Anglo-American common regulation tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted within the civil regulation tradition.
fourteen. In the light in the position explained previously mentioned, it is concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his possess and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the length of service or in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
Unfortunately, that wasn't legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son informed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to getting sexually molested the few’s son several times.
Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of the lower courts.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted around within the foster care system.
However it's made obvious that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also guarantee regard of the family shed in accordance with legislation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that even though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the merit of the many qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded through the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part on the respondent department.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property law.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions would be the opinions that are filed about the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and tend to be not the court's final opinion.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability while in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
Usually, only an appeal accepted with the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, For several reasons, these kinds of appeals will often be not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC here Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.